A nutrient effect on the TEX₈₆ paleotemperature proxy
Nutrient stress leaves a warm bias in sedimentary TEX₈₆, an effect seen in cultures that we show is also recorded in seafloor sediments.
In brief
Lab cultures show that when marine archaea are short of nutrients they build more rings into their membrane lipids, which raises TEX86 as if the water were warmer. This study shows that the same “nutrient effect” is recorded in seafloor sediments, and that it can be separated from the temperature signal.
Key findings
- A global signal. In an expanded coretop database, TEX86 residuals (what is left after removing the thermal effect) correlate negatively with nitrate: ρ = −0.31 (P < 0.001). Low-nutrient sediments read too warm.
- Stronger where nitrate gradients are steep. In regions with sharp nutrient gradients the correlation reaches ρ = −0.73 to −0.91.
- A simpler explanation for the Red Sea. Its anomalously high TEX86 fits extreme nutrient stress in an oligotrophic sea, without needing endemic archaeal clades.
- Visible in the past. In the Arabian Sea, TEX86 warms by up to 7 °C during the Younger Dryas and Heinrich Stadial 1, when alkenone (UK′37) records cool and δ15N points to weaker upwelling and fewer nutrients. In the Tasman Sea, interglacial TEX86 temperatures overshoot UK′37 as the nutrient-poor subtropical gyre expands.
Key figure
From finding to predictor → TEXAS
Nitrate became one of the two nonthermal predictors in TEXAS, our proxy system model for TEX86 paleothermometry. Below 1 µmol/L it shifts the TEXAS S-curve to account for nutrient stress, and the Tasman Sea records from this paper return as a TEXAS case study.
Cite
(Rattanasriampaipong et al., 2025). Data: 10.5281/zenodo.14806961.